Sean Duffy Has Great Fundraising Quarter!

Read it here:

Nice of the Minnesota media to take notice.

Best quotes:

"Rep. Pete Sessions’s (R-Texas) prediction that Obey — who is seeking a 21st term in 2010 — would face a “tier one” challenge."

and

"“I’ve got more $5 and $10 checks than you can shake a stick at,” said Duffy."

Also from the Duffy website

Go Sean go!

TTFN,

Jim

Scott Walker Compared To David Duke When In Truth . . .

Greetings,

In a recent tirade by Milwaukee County Board Chair Lee Holloway, Holloway compared Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker to David Duke. Mr. Holloway obviously doesn't know much about Scott because once upon a time, a younger Scott Walker went on Milwaukee TV and took on David Duke:

Most memorable lines:

Scott Walker to David Duke, "Representative Duke, you don't believe in America!"

David Duke to Scott Walker, "Shame on you Scott Walker!"

Also, for what it's worth, David Duke ran THREE times as a Democrat before declaring himself to be a Republican.

David Duke even ran for President as a Democrat in 1988!

Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana Results) Threshold = Plurality Primary Day, March 8, 1988

Candidate	Affiliation	Support	Outcome
Jesse Jackson	Democratic	221,522 (35%)	Won Louisiana
Al Gore	Democratic	174,971 (28%)	Lost Louisiana
Michael Dukakis	Democratic	95,661 (15%)	Lost Louisiana
Dick Gephardt	Democratic	67,029 (11%)	Lost Louisiana
Gary Hart	Democratic	26,437 (4%)	Lost Louisiana
David Duke	Democratic	23,391 (4%)	Lost Louisiana
Others	Democratic	16,008 (3%)	Lost Louisiana

United States President 1988 (Louisiana Results)

Threshold = Plurality

Election Day, November 8, 1988

Candidate	Affiliation	Support	Outcome
George Bush & Dan Quayle	Republican	883,672 (54%)	Won Louisiana
Michael Dukakis & Lloyd Bentsen	Democratic	717,309 (44%)	Lost Louisiana
David Duke & Floyd Parker	Independent Populist	18,612 (1%)	Lost Louisiana
Others	n.a.	8,429 (1%)	Lost Louisiana

After losing the Democratic nomination Duke switched to the 'Populist' party (one of those goofy 3rd parties).

Now for Duke to 1st join and 1st run as a Democrat in the south is completely normal. You see, the KKK was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party in the south from it's founding. It victimized both 'negroes' and white Republicans. Often klansmen would offer to stop terrorizing blacks if they promised not to vote Republican. Many prominent Democratic lawmakers were Klansmen. Senator Robert Byrd [D-WV] was once an "Exalted Cyclops" in the KKK but later quit. That said, he has made racist gaffes on and off over the years. One of the KKK's primary aims was not just to promote the ideology of white supremacy in and of itself but also to "suppressing Republican voting and running Republicans out of office." But don't take my word for it, compare the party platforms of the Democrat and Republican parties in 1860:

Democratic Party Platform of 1860
Quote - 6. Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.

Republican Party Platform of 1860
Quote -

7. That the new dogma that the Constitution, of its own force, carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with contemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent; is revolutionary in its tendency, and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country.

8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom: That, as our Republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that "no persons should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the Constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of Congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to givelegal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.

9. That we brand the recent reopening of the African slave trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age; and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic

10. That in the recent vetoes, by their Federal Governors, of the acts of the legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted Democratic principle of Non-Intervention and Popular Sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska Bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein.

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Even a liberal from Madison knows Milwaukee County Board Chair Lee Holloway is wrong.

Lee Holloway under the dentist's lamp

TTFN,

Jim

Abe Lincoln Ale Night

Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009

Time: 7:00pm - ?

Location: Les & Jim’s Lincoln Lanes - 1208 N Center Ave Merrill, WI 54452

More info:

http://www.lincolnlanesonline.com/

Special Guests: Assemblyman Don Friske, WSAU Host Pat Snyder, Congressional candidates Dan Mielke & Sean Duffy.



View Larger Map

See you there,

Jim

My In-Depth Analysis Of The Pelosi-Dalai Lama Meeting

You too right?

TTFN,

Jim

NEWSFLASH! Bill Ayers May Be Obama Book Author

Greetings all,

1st I read it here, on a blog that normally covers Lutheran Theology. Then I read more here. Amazing confession. Is it true? According to these blogs:


"There I was, sitting in Reagan National Monday morning, sipping a Starbucks by the United counter before going through security. I had a little time, so I was browsing through the news. Some military guys had borrowed a chair from my table. I looked up from time to time to enjoy the sun streaming through. That's when I saw Bill Ayers, an instant blight. Scruffy, thinning beard, dippy earring, and the wirerims, heading to order. I gathered my things, got my camera ready, and snapped a shot right when he got his coffee.

I asked--what are you doing in D.C. Mr. Ayers?

For a moment I thought he might be on my flight back to Chicago. Charming. Initially I guess he thought I was laying claim to his coffee or something. He gave me an uneasy cheesy smile when he realized I was taking his picture. I asked him if he was speaking at GW? (Only I said GFW, guess I had the VFW on my mind) He said oh you mean GW, he said no...was trying to decide if I was a fan, then said he was giving a lecture in Arlington to a Renaissance group on education--that's what I do, education--you shouldn't believe everything you hear about me, you know nothing about me. I said, I know plenty--I'm from Chicago, a conservative blogger, and I'll post this. (Oh, yeah, Bill Ayers, quite the Renaissance man, nail-bomber extraordinaire. Gee, I see another friend of Barack, U.S. Sec. of Education Arne Duncan was there too. "The conference theme is “A Time for Reflection, Celebration and Rebirth.” How touching. At best, useless, at worst, so wrong.)

Then, unprompted he said--I wrote Dreams From My Father. I said, oh, so you admit it. He said--Michelle asked me to. I looked at him. He seemed eager. He's about my height, short. He went on to say--and if you can prove it, we can split the royalties. So I said, stop pulling my leg. Horrible thought. But he came again--I really wrote it, the wording was similar. I said I believe you probably heavily edited it. He said--I wrote it. I said--why would I believe you, you're a liar.

He had no answer to that. Just looked at me. Then he turned and walked off, and said again his bit about my proving it and splitting the proceeds.

But the question remains--is Barack Obama a fraud? Is his myth-making creation and only major accomplishment a product of Bill Ayers' imagination? (or his own) Is our President Barack Obama's biography written by an unrepentant domestic terrorist?"

Scariest thing I have read about Obama yet. Super-scary.

Read it all here

and here.

TTFN,

Jim

NewsBusted - Obama, Norman Hsu, Letterman, Polanski & Other Victims

Greetings,

Always funny:

The fact I saw this video after I wrote my column about Letterman, Palin & Polanski shows once again there is a unity of opinion on these matters.

TTFN,

Jim

Palin Vindicated

Matthew 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits: Do men gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles: 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Remember this story:

Sarah Palin: Letterman Owes Apology "to Young Women Across the Country"

Well, Dave Letterman then 'sort of' apologized to Sarah Palin & her family and the news cycle went on and we kind of forgot about it but now the entertainment headlines are carrying these stories:

Letterman says wife "horribly hurt" by sex scandal

and

Director Roman Polanski Arrested in Switzerland

Hollywood lives by one set of morals and the rest of the country by another. What Letterman hypothetically joked about, Roman Polanski actually did and Letterman thought it was funny. The joke is on Letterman now, FWIW, I feel badly for Letterman's wife, she can't help it her husband is a lout. That said, you think the Palin family is feeling a bit vindicated right about now? Me too.

TTFN,

Jim

What's The Difference?

Greetings,

Is there a difference between the organizations 'Mielke For Congress' and 'Citizens For An Open And Honest Government'? Judge for yourself:

The above was from the bottom of this page



The above was from the top of this page

Note the names, also note the irony of the statement, "Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s agent or committee." Clearly, that is not the case.

Furthermore, note the PH numbers and top search result beneath them:

So basically, the treasurer for both 'Mielke For Congress' and 'Citizens For An Open And Honest Government' are one in the same, Dan's wife Robin.

Mielke For Congress = Citizens For An Open And Honest Government

So any robo-call, rally, advertisement, etcetera coming from 'Citizens For An Open And Honest Government' is really just another name for 'Mielke For Congress'. Nobody should mistake it for a band of citizens united together for any common purpose other than electing Dan.

I guess Dan figures that a rose by another name will smell sweeter, especially under the well chosen wording of "...paid for by 'Citizens For An Open And Honest Government'" instead of "...paid for by 'Dan Mielke For Congress'".

Also worth looking at:

Dan Mielke on IQ Elections

Dan Mielke's FEC report, note how much is self financed and how much is from individuals.

TTFN,

Jim