Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Dave Obey Visits Merrill - Sort Of

Our story begins with someone calling me and asking me if I knew where Dave Obey would be. I didn't know I said but I would look into it. I live in Merrill in Lincoln County Wisconsin (important background info to keep in mind) and congressman Obey was supposed to appear in Merrill today.

1) 1st I called congressman Obey's office in Wausau, I was first told no and then told their computers were down (sounds familiar doesn't it?) and the lady on the phone could not access the information.

2) 2nd I called congressman Obey's office in Superior (no answer).

3) 3rd I called congressman Obey's office in D.C. which put me on hold for over 5 minutes (I hung up).

4) I called Melissa Schroeder's house (Lincoln Co Dems Chair) and was told they knew nothing but politely referred me to the Wausau office and even offered to give me the number.

5) I called the Vice-Chair's home and got the answering machine.

6) I next called WJMT Radio and they knew nothing either.

7) I then called the Merrill Courier and they also were not told anything about congressman Obey coming to Merrill.

8) I next called the Merrill FOTO News and the lady I spoke to there also had not heard of it.

9) I tried Mayor Doug Williams office and his secretary was not aware the congressman was going to be here.

10) I called 3's Company on a whim because that is where the local Dems meet and the person on the phone didn't know anything.

11) I called a reporter (I'll protect my source) at the Wausau Daily Herald and he knew something but was not at his desk so he referred me to a colleague at the paper and voila! That person told me everything I needed to know - the event was at the Merrill Area Public School Administration Building.

12) I called the Merrill Area Public School Administration Building and asked the operator who referred me to "the person who can help you". I asked that person (an unidentified woman) who said yes it was there (in the present-tense) with a few "education administrators" and I asked if the event was open to the public and she hesitated and said eveyone who was there had been invited.

So the event was by invitation-only. Did congressman Obey rent the room? Were campaign checks accepted? Aren't there campaign finance laws about political events in taxpayer supported buildings like the Merrill Area Public School Administration Building? Why was it not listed on the event calendar?

I'll tell you why. Because after 40 years of breathing the rarefied air of our Nation's Capitol, Dave Obey is out of touch with the majority of his constituents and only feels he needs to hobnob with the people of his choice - to hell with the ordinary folks who elected him. Also as an elected lawmaker, he may feel since he writes the laws that he is above the law.

After 40 years of really good luck (no real serious challenges save maybe 1994) with opponents the hubris that surrounds and pervades congressman Obey's head must be substantial.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
Amid the tranquils sweet around, and to my own design,
I built me castles of a towering height,
And thereto did my pleasures and my rising hopes resign,
Thought that these bulwarks would resist all might.

But, lo! they fell in ruined heaps, and mighty was the fall,
And my bright hopes lay ruined at my feet,
And the deluding dream of fancy passed away, and all
The scenes so fair did from me now retreat;

Like as the mirage travellers see upon the desert waste,
In view where cooling waters seem to rise,
And which the body longs to reach, the parched tongue to taste--
Alas! alas! such fancy is not wise.


John D. Cossar 1870
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Yep, Dave Obey is going down this fall.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Glenn Beck on Obama's "Spending Freeze" Also Known As The 8 Twinkie Diet

Greetings,

If you haven't seen this - WATCH! This is all you need to know about the Obama "Spending Freeze" in plain English with an easy to understand analogy:

Glenn Beck- January 27, 2010 (Part 1/5)


Glenn Beck- January 27, 2010 (Part 2/5)


Speaking as a junk food junkie I can relate - I mean if I stop getting 2 Hardees burgers . . .

Hardee's Portobello Melt
http://wouldibuyitagain.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/portobello-mushroom-melt-hardees.jpg

Hardee's Bacon-Cheese Thickburger
http://www.hardees.com/content/products/menu/ThrdBacCheese_Lunch.jpg

then can I call it a diet if I get 1 Monster Burger?

Hardees MonsterBurger
http://www.hardees.com/content/products/menu/MonsterThickburger_LunchDinner.jpg

and maybe have a king-size Kit-Kat bar later?

http://www.candyfavorites.com/pi/605.jpg

Because let me see, we got the bank bailouts, the auto-industry bailouts, Dave Obey's $787 Billion 'Stimulus' bill, what else? Anyways, I'm glad that Obama wants to freeze spending - now that he has increased it to all time record highs!

All I got to say is, "Pass me the box of Twinkies Mr. President."

http://seesdifferent.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/twinkies.jpg

TTFN,

Jim

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

David 'Antoinette' Obey Visits Rhode Island

Photobucket

OK, he didn't buy those pearls, but he DID spend significant time with the Kennedys in Providence, Rhode Island's 'Jewelry District'. Yeah, you read that right, while unemployment hovers around 10% in his own District, he is hanging out in bauble-land talking pork. Read it and weep here:

Providence seeking federal funds for Knowledge District

My favorite quotes:

How much would it take to make Providence a national leader in life sciences research? According to city leaders, about $460 million in public and private investments over the next five years.

and

The proposal is a follow-up to House Appropriations Chairman David Obey’s November tour of the Jewelry District. That tour, led by Kennedy and Cicilline, was meant to show the Wisconsin Democrat what federal investment has done to help grow Rhode Island’s research and science institutions and to stress the need for increased federal funding for the state’s economic future.

Is this guy off his rocker? Did he think we were not watching? Did he think the 'folks back home' in his district would never know, never learn about this trip?

But wait - there's more!

Providence’s Jewelry District: Growth hotspot?

My favorite part of the whole article? The article's first words are Dave's name and job title! No s***!

PROVIDENCE — U.S. Rep. David R. Obey, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, toured four major research institutions in the city’s Jewelry District on Friday along with Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy, Mayor David N. Cicilline, Governor Carcieri and other state leaders.

That was the 1st paragraph - and there is more. Here's another great quote,

The purpose of the tour was to show Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat, what federal investment has done to help grow Rhode Island’s research and science institutions and to stress the need for increased federal funding in the life sciences for the state’s economic future, according to Kennedy, who is also a member of the appropriations committee, which oversees the federal budget.

But it does not stop there, read further,

Obey, following the two-hour tour, seemed supportive of the state’s vision. The district is a “solid engine for growth,” he said. “This is a good investment for Rhode Island. We need to be doing dozens of these in the U.S. as a whole.”

He supports Rhode Island's vision - what about Northern Wisconsin Mr. Obey?

Photobucket

TTFN,

Jim

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

John McCain & Dan Mielke - The Truth

Greetings,

A little while ago in an email sent out on November 29th by the Mielke campaign (i.e. - by Dan) Dan Mielke asserted,

"John McCain is known for not being a true conservative. In fact, he was a moderate in many ways. In 2007 & 2008, I fought against McCain regarding the McCain/Kennedy bill promoting amnesty for illegal immigrants. I also strongly opposed his liberal stand on abortion. During his campaign for President, he promised to tote the line on conservative values because he knew we would not tolerate anything less. It did not work. In 2008, I voted for Sarah Palin and not John McCain."

Never mind how goofy that last sentence sounds since Palin was McCain's running mate.

About a week and a half later on December the 10th, Sean Duffy was being interviewed by Pat Snyder and Tom King on 550 AM and a caller named 'Bill' called in praising Dan Mielke and took a swipe at John McCain saying,

"I don't want another Dave Obey with a Republican name. I don't want a Tommy Thompson or McCain or a 'big-tent' Republican. I want a conservative . . ."

Sean Duffy responded saying,

"I'm a true conservative and if you have a concern about John McCain, you should look at the buttons that Dan Mielke had out last year that he distributed throughout the campaign cycle that said, *McCain/Mielke* and he gave them to everyone in the party - so he's tied himself to John McCain. If you believe in John McCain's conservative principles - and I uh, use that term loosely, then vote for Dan Mielke but it's Dan Mielke who tied himself to John McCain with those uh, with those political buttons."

After that broadcast there was some chatter about this among party chairs in the district. Many of us recalled that long before McCain had picked Palin as his running mate, back in the early winter of 2008 when we had our 7th District convention there were piles of McCain/Mielke pins on every table! Sure enough look what has now popped up:

McCain_Mielke

Seems Dan made so many there were at least 2 different types:

McCain_Mielke

Some with thin lettering and some with smaller, bolder lettering.

McCain_Mielke

I wonder how Dan's friends in the Constitution Party will feel about this? I mean Dan said,

"John McCain is known for not being a true conservative. In fact, he was a moderate in many ways. In 2007 & 2008, I fought against McCain regarding the McCain/Kennedy bill promoting amnesty for illegal immigrants. I also strongly opposed his liberal stand on abortion. During his campaign for President, he promised to tote the line on conservative values because he knew we would not tolerate anything less. It did not work. In 2008, I voted for Sarah Palin and not John McCain."

So while McCain was running as the pro-amnesty candidate, months before Sarah Palin was on the ticket, Mielke (who says he is opposed to McCain-Kennedy) was pairing himself up with McCain? Does Dan Mielke expect me to believe he is anti-McCain when he spent (presumably) donated campaign dollars or even his own money to make these pins identifying himself with McCain? If Jim Traficant were here he'd say, "Mr. Speaker - Beam Me Up!"

Dan Mielke has lied about his support for John McCain. What else has he lied about?

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.parentdish.com/media/2009/07/duffy-family-photo-slw-7-9-09.jpg

You think?

TTFN,

Jim

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Strike A Blow For Freedom! Dump Obey - Elect Duffy!

Elections belong to the people. It is their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters. - Abbie Hoffman

So what?
David Obey

http://www.famousfaces.org/famousfaces/Abbie-Hoffman.jpg <span class=
Can you tell these hippies apart?

In order to cover up for the failure of the first stimulus bill, Dave Obey has just helped pass a more modest (cough, choke) second stimulus bill. But democrats are not calling it that, they are calling it an 'omnibus' bill - one that costs $447 Billion. Congressman Obey also arranged to hand out $11 Billion in earmarks in fiscal year 2010. How does congressman Obey think we will pay for it when his usual partner in crime Speaker Nancy Pelosi killed his war tax?

I mean when Obey goes left of Nancy Pelosi - can he still really be representing central and northern Wisconsin? Dave Obey seems stuck in a rut, his answer to every problem is to tax or spend. He doesn't seem to have much imagination for any other ideas. I mean with guys like Dave Obey around, we'd have more fiscal sanity if Doctor Evil were in charge of the Federal Budget:



We don't have to take this much longer though, we have a choice. On December 16th in 1773 was when the first Boston Tea Party. Go to StrikeABlowForFreedom.com and contribute to his challenger Sean Duffy. Duffy is a movement conservative. He is a 4 term District Attorney in Ashland Wisconsin who has spent the last 7-8 years of his life locking up the bad guys. Duffy is a father of 5 with #6 on the way. His beautiful and talented wife Rachel just recently wrote a book on being a stay at home mother.

I've had the pleasure to have known Sean since 2003 as a Republican Party activist. Sean is a family man who has strong conservative values all-around, especially in regards to the rule of law as well as economics and values. Maybe I'm a little biased having known Sean, but don't you think this is *the kind of guy we need* as an antidote to the corruption, expediency & end-justifies-the-means mentality of Obey & Obama? I sure do.

Click Here
<span class=

Want to make a statement? Give $12.16 in memory of the date of the Boston Tea Party. Can't do that much? Give $5. You can do better? Give $50 or $100. Whatever, just give Sean something so he can charge on to beat Dave Obey - the chairman of the appropriations committee who has shepherded every bailout, every porkbarrel project, every penny of wasteful spending since the Democrats took control of the House.

TTFN & God Bless,

Jim

PS: This blog is the sole work of the author and the author alone and not the work of or opinion of any political party or campaign committee.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Obey's Gambit - Raise Taxes To Pay For Afghanistan War

Greeting gentle readers,

Only a guy who feels so secure in his seat in Congress could propose the things Dave Obey proposes. I mean - this is a guy who pitches his own record albums on a campaign website:

Dave Obey and the Capitol Offenses
Far Left: Dave Obey

1st he passed that $787 billion blunder we now jokingly call the 'Stimulus Package', now while we are in the height of a recession, he decides we need to raise taxes to pay for the war in Afghanistan. There are several good reasons to do this (from his point of view):

1) It silences critics on the right, after all, supporting the troops is patriotic right? Who would not support that?

2) He already passed a $787 billion stimulus bill, voted for national healthcare (TRILLION$) and all that spending is supposed to be "deficit neutral" right? So this is a tax to make sure we don't create a deficit by spending extra on national defense.

Here is the quote that tells it all:

"On the merits I think it's a mistake to deepen our involvement. But if we are going to do that, then at least we ought to pay for it. Because if we don't, if we don't pay for it, then the cost of the Afghan war will wipe out every other initiative that we have to rebuild our economy," he said. "Ain't going to be no money for nothing if we pour it all into Afghanistan."

Taken from:
Lawmakers Propose 'War Surtax' to Pay for Troop Increase in Afghanistan and
Pressure Builds Over Obama’s Afghanistan Plan

But don't take my word for it what Congressman Obey's cheif concerns are, read his own words:

"We have spent the last year in Congress debating how we will pay for health care reform, which is expected to cost nearly a trillion dollars over the next ten years. The Congressional Budget Office is earnestly measuring the cost of each competing health care plan, and has had most of Congress twisting themselves into knots in order to keep the health care bill deficit neutral. Shouldn’t it be asked to do the same thing with respect to money spent on the current wars? We have already spent nearly a trillion dollars on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan - an effort that’s been paid for with borrowed money - and another ten years would cost about a trillion more. If we keep that up, it will devour our nation’s ability to address virtually any other priority." - emphasis mine

Are we talking about the war on terror or healthcare? It's hard to tell going by Dave Obey's favorite newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle:

"He said the ten-year cost of the war clocks in at $900 billion, about the size of the Democratic health care legislation."

He said?

And that 1st quote came from the 'Health Care Arena' section of Politico. So the image I'm getting is that National Defense (a priority outlined in our Constitution) takes a backseat to healthcare (something not addressed in our Constitution). I got a news flash for congressman Obey - If the Nation is not safe, what we pay the doctor, dentist or our insurance companies won't matter!

That is a 1st principle that goes all the way back to Hobbes, the 1st priority of a nation is the security of it's citizenry. A secure citizenry can enjoy Freedom, a people living in the condition of strife can't.

To put words in Dave Obey's mouth, "If we blow money on a silly war, there will be no money for our newly created and very expensive social programs, especially MY stimulus bill!"

Oh come on now congressman, you are more creative than that, you'll get the money from somewhere right?

http://www.noloadfunds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/general-us-treasury-11.jpghttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_zYMxRYW7j2bfmi7X1zg8kEO2y1ekDVByLJPfSPYsqIj4xn7xrJYlVxbk35vzgeUIhsqCBDSshUbfZ3VpBJCWoPUFUQWUgyFDxDs_JTi8WB7mN7A2y2F2wCfg6LZUCaV3hLjX3PRRzEx7/s400/Dave_Obey_Dollar_Make_More.jpg

Now that's the creativity that made the Democratic party great!

More articles about Dave's Public Policy Blunder:

CBS
David Obey Calls for War Tax on Wealthy

Reuters
The Afghanistan war surtax gambit

Wall Street Journal
Obey's Afghan War Surtax
The real liberal objection to the war on terror is that it takes away from domestic spending priorities like ObamaCare.


TIME Magazine
Obey's War Tax

The Washington Independent
Obey Wants a Deficit-Neutral Afghanistan War

WSJ - The Wealth Report
More Afghanistan Troops: Send the Bill to the Wealthy?

Here's one of my personal faves from Cody Willard at Marketwatch, just in case you think my intimation about congressman Obey's priorities are wrong:

"At any rate, let’s keep the record straight about Representative Obey’s voting on spending priorities, shall we?
David Obey on Budget & Economy

Democratic Representative (WI-7):

Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending.

Voted YES on $800 Billion TARP Bailout

Voted YES on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures.

Voted YES on additional $825 billion for economic recovery package.

Voted YES on $15B bailout for GM and Chrysler.

Voted YES on $60B stimulus package for jobs, infrastructure, & energy."

Full blog here.

And my true favorite for the day from the Los Angleles Times which basically shows that congressman Obey is an aging hippie, molded by the Viet Nam era politics:

"David Obey came to Congress in 1969, a young Democratic congressman from Wisconsin, opposed to the Vietnam War and mindful of the funding it was draining from Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs.

Thirty years later, he is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee and adamant that Afghanistan is a similar quagmire that could bankrupt President Obama's domestic agenda."

It's not about fiscal responsibility, it's all about finding cover for Dave Obey's fiscal irresponsibility.

TTFN,

Jim

Monday, November 23, 2009

Obama, The Recovery Act & Fatigue

Greetings,

Watch this video. In it you find some interesting admissions if you pay attention. The president says the 'Recovery Act' helped "stabilize state budgets" and that in turn helped save the jobs of state employees. Not one word about how the Recovery Act created new private sector jobs or grew small businesses, only that stabilized state budgets, saved state employee jobs and created some infrastructure jobs (temporary road construction) which will go away once the work is completed. In other words, Dave Obey's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was a $787 billion stopgap bill - and that is allowing for the best possible construction. Since the bill really only helped state employees and unions (those road construction jobs) it could be construed as a special interest porkbarrel pay-off. Detractors will say he also talked about Tax cuts - but notice how unenthusiastic he looks when mentioning it as if talking about it were obligatory and he just wanted to get it out of the way. On the other hand, he seems to think that stabilizing state budgets with federal money (the only time he looks really animated) was a worthwhile accomplishment!




http://www.ehotdiscussion.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/jimmy-carter.jpg

I smell Victory in 2010 & 2012!

TTFN,

Jim

SNL & Obama's Economy

Greetings gentle readers,

I really have got to watch more SNL:



I really have nothing further to add to that.

TTFN,

Jim

Friday, November 20, 2009

Dave Obey Points The Finger At Himself








Now call me crazy - but if I had written a really bad bill I'd do one of two things:

1) Try to fix it to redeem myself

or

2) Lay low and keep my mouth shut

Since I'm not an adviser to Dave Obey and his staff does not seem to be giving him good advice (or he is so foolish himself he isn't accepting good advice, another sign he needs to go) he is out attacking the results of his own bill. Yes, that is right, he is attacking the outcome of his own legislation. I don't know why because months ago he reassured us that mistakes would be made but, "So what" as he said right?

If Dave Obey's projected response was "So what?" then what are we worried about right?

My favorite Dave Obey fix-my-bill-before-the-people-figure-this-out quote comes from the Wisconsin Rapids Tribune:

"The inaccuracies on recovery.gov that have come to light are outrageous, and the administration owes itself, the Congress and every American a commitment to work night and day to correct the ludicrous mistakes," Obey said in a statement issued late Monday.


Translation: How dare the bureaucracy mess up my bill!














The whole thing reminds me of that passage from Holy Writ that says that a double-minded man is unstable in all his ways. To be sure the only thing that is stable about the economy Dave Obey's stimulus bill created is the rising unemployment figures and rising gold prices that are stimulated by many first-time bullion buyers who think there will be a coming economic crash. A crash caused by the new cap & trade bill, the stimulus bill, the auto bailout and our governments predilection to print money like we are making Lay's potato chips.




















TTFN,

Jim

Day By Day